ToS;DR

You aren’t forced into binding arbitration in case of disputes


Service: LinkedIn
Status: QUOTE NOT FOUND
Case: You aren’t forced into binding arbitration in case of disputes
Changes: 4
Source: link
Author: AgnesDeLion (20760) Staff


In the unlikely event we end up in a legal dispute, you and LinkedIn agree to resolve it in California courts using California law, or Dublin, Ireland courts using Irish law.
Change excerpt


Comments:
No comments found


We track editorial changes to analyses and updates to a point's status and display the previous versions here as part of an effort to promote transparency regarding our curation process.

Version 4: 2024-11-27 04:58:41 UTC by rec (37333) Staff

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: APPROVED

Updated Status: QUOTE NOT FOUND

Version 3: 2023-07-11 04:48:11 UTC by Deleted Staff

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: No changes recorded

Updated Status: No changes recorded

Version 2: 2021-05-16 07:38:22 UTC by pederdm000 (2130) Staff

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: PENDING

Updated Status: APPROVED

Version 1: 2021-05-15 21:04:16 UTC by AgnesDeLion (20760) Staff

Previous Title:

Updated Title: You aren’t forced into binding arbitration in case of disputes

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis: Generated through the annotate view

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING