imported from kizrN7qb1Ck
Obviously one of the most important issues that's addressed in ToS is
the copyright license. Not all services are equal in this regard,
especially between services where the user operate in private and
services where the user shares / publishes content with other people /
with the world.
With this first topic, I'd like to gather some comparative
information and discuss what seems to be a fair balance between
needs to operate the service and rights of the authors & the
public. Then we could try to categorize them and give them a
The first thing to discuss obviously is the scope of the copyright
license. Some of the ToS out there seems to go as far as they can get in
scope. It seems to me that the biggest difference are:
* some ToS don't grant a specifically large license to the
operator of the service but fall back on a copyright public
license e.g. creative commons
* some ToS require the ability to transfer, sublicense with others
(sometimes it is limited to the partners e.g. Twitter Partners)
Do I miss anything substantial?
you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable,
royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you
post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License).
By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the
Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free
license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce,
process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and
distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution
methods (now known or later developed).
You agree that this license includes the right for Twitter to
provide, promote, and improve the Services and to make Content
submitted to or through the Services available to other
companies, organizations or individuals who partner with Twitter
for the syndication, broadcast, distribution or publication of
such Content on other media and services, subject to our terms
and conditions for such Content use.
By submitting Content to Operator for inclusion on your Website,
you grant all readers the right to use, re-use, modify and/or
re-distribute the Content under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 3.0.
en publiant leurs messages sur Seenthis, les auteurs acceptent :
— que ces messages soient publiés (présentés au public) sur le
— que ces messages soient organisés et enrichis par les
automatismes présents dans le système Seenthis (traduction,
By publishing their messages on Seenthis, the authors agree
- these messages are published (displayed to the public) on the
- these messages are organised and augmented by automatic
systems in Seenthis (translation, taggin...).
Note that SeenThis gives the option when the message is posted to choose
which license (classic copyright, cc-by-sa, and others)
By submitting Content to Automattic for inclusion on your
Website, you grant Automattic a world-wide, royalty-free, and
non-exclusive license to reproduce, modify, adapt and publish
the Content solely for the purpose of displaying, distributing
and promoting your blog.
French Coordinator, FSFE chat: email@example.com
www.fsfe.org/about/roy mobile: +336 08 74 13 41
mobile DE: +49 151 143 56 563
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to email@example.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tosdr?hl=en.
duplicate of 920
Point automatically declined as no activity have been monitored over a course of 2 months. Was: draft
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: DRAFT
Updated Status: DECLINED