ToS;DR

This service does not force users into binding arbitration


Service: Observable
Status: APPROVED
Case: You aren’t forced into binding arbitration in case of disputes
Changes: 4
Source: link
Author: Jed Fox (395) Curator




Comments:
On 2019-06-22 06:08:02 UTC, jessew (2993) Curator wrote:

declined: No evidence presented.

On 2019-06-22 15:56:23 UTC, Jed Fox (395) Curator wrote:

The terms of service do not mention arbitration; therefore, users are not forced into a binding arbitration agreement.

On 2019-06-23 00:36:08 UTC, jessew (2993) Curator wrote:

approved: Hm, fair enough. We should probably reconsider having this as a separate case, though!



We track editorial changes to analyses and updates to a point's status and display the previous versions here as part of an effort to promote transparency regarding our curation process.

Version 1: 2019-06-23 00:36:08 UTC by jessew (2993) Curator

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: PENDING

Updated Status: APPROVED

Version 2: 2019-06-22 15:56:39 UTC by Jed Fox (395) Curator

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: DECLINED

Updated Status: PENDING

Version 3: 2019-06-22 06:08:02 UTC by jessew (2993) Curator

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: PENDING

Updated Status: DECLINED

Version 4: 2019-03-13 14:01:20 UTC by Jed Fox (395) Curator

Previous Title:

Updated Title: This service does not force users into binding arbitration

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis:

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING