By using any Amazon Service, you agree that the Federal Arbitration Act, applicable federal law, and the laws of the state of Washington, without regard to principles of conflict of laws, will govern these Conditions of Use and any dispute of any sort that might arise between you and Amazon.
changes-requested: Wouldn´t this case be more appropriate: "The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is less friendly to user privacy protection." ?
tbh, I don't really know how friendly the laws of the state of Washington are to user privacy (or if they are less friendly than... where?).
I guess I don't really understand that phrase, but it seems to me to be designed for when a company chooses a jurisdiction other than where they are headquartered for the purposes of getting around privacy legislation. But then Amazon's headquarters are in Washington, so if that's the intent, that suggestion may not be the best.
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: pending
Updated Status: changes-requested
Updated Title: The court of law governing the terms is in location X
Updated Analysis: Generated through the annotate view
Updated Status: pending