THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF BINDING ARBITRATION ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE ALL DISPUTES ARISING UNDER THEM, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS
changes-requested: The annotation is present in the linked ToS but not in the annotated ToS.
not possible to use annoated ToS; the webcrawler does not work
Again, don't think the failure of annotation and crawling should mean a deletion from TOS;DR as TOS;DR has been around long before this annotation feature was added, plus there is the feature to add points not linked to a certain document
It is Brainly that is preventing our crawler to read their ToS by using a captcha. I am discussing this issue with our team and proposed to exclude such badly behaving services from ToS;DR.
For some reason attempting to recrawl set the status to "Draft"
approved: LGTM
Quote not found
Found quote, changed: quoteText quoteStart quoteEnd status
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: No changes recorded
Updated Status: No changes recorded
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: PENDING
Updated Status: APPROVED
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: DRAFT
Updated Status: PENDING
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: PENDING
Updated Status: DRAFT
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: CHANGES REQUESTED
Updated Status: PENDING
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: PENDING
Updated Status: CHANGES REQUESTED
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: DRAFT
Updated Status: PENDING
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: No changes recorded
Updated Analysis: No changes recorded
Previous Status: PENDING
Updated Status: DRAFT
Previous Title: No changes recorded
Updated Title: No changes recorded
Previous Analysis: Generated through the annotate view
Updated Analysis: In the Terms of Use applicable to users not in Europe, "THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF BINDING ARBITRATION ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE ALL DISPUTES ARISING UNDER THEM, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS." It also states that, "YOU AND BRAINLY AGREE THAT THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE FORUM AND REMEDY FOR ANY AND ALL DISPUTES AND CLAIMS RELATING IN ANY WAY TO OR ARISING OUT OF THESE TERMS SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING ARBITRATION." However, for the Terms of Use applicable to users in Europe, "English law will apply to all disputes and the interpretation of these Terms of Use. The English courts will have non-exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute arising from or related to your use of the Service."
Previous Status: No changes recorded
Updated Status: No changes recorded
Previous Title:
Updated Title: This service forces users into binding arbitration in the case of disputes
Previous Analysis:
Updated Analysis: Generated through the annotate view
Previous Status:
Updated Status: PENDING