ToS;DR

The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is less friendly to user privacy protection.


Service: Discogs
Status: APPROVED
Case: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is less friendly to user privacy protection.
Changes: 5
Source: link
Author: Michael (568) Curator


You will be contracting for this service directly with Zink Media, LLC (Discogs) (State of Oregon Limited Liability Company with registration number 724027-88)
The court of law for Discogs is located in the State of Oregon, USA. The United States have implemented some laws that are detrimental to the privacy of users of US-American services, most noticeably the PATRIOT Act.


Comments:
On 2018-08-27 08:41:17 UTC, michielbdejong (6) Staff wrote:

approved: if we penalize DisCogs for this, then we should add this case to our checklist and also penalize other services that are affected by the patriot act.

On 2018-08-27 23:21:05 UTC, Michael (568) Curator wrote:

I agree. The problem with this case might be that for this jurisdiction it was easy to figure out whether it's friendly or less friendly to user privacy protection, but for other countries, in which the privacy protection practices are not as well-known, we would have to research it for every country individually.
Plus, where do you draw the line between friendly or less friendly?
Again, I'd argue that it's not hard to say for the US, but some country may have practices and laws that are good for privacy protection, while others are not.
We would need to have a checklist of countries and rate those individually and give them a 'good' or 'bad' or 'neither', so that eventually we would probably have a second, meta layer for ToS;DR.
...it would be very helpful, though, because a country's laws can make all the difference.

On 2020-12-14 16:15:04 UTC, michielbdejong (6) Staff wrote:

Quote not found



We track editorial changes to analyses and updates to a point's status and display the previous versions here as part of an effort to promote transparency regarding our curation process.

Version 1: 2023-07-11 06:33:43 UTC by Deleted

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: No changes recorded

Updated Status: No changes recorded

Version 2: 2021-01-18 10:52:47 UTC by Agnes_de_Lion (20760) Staff

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: QUOTE NOT FOUND

Updated Status: APPROVED

Version 3: 2018-08-27 08:41:17 UTC by michielbdejong (6) Staff

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: PENDING

Updated Status: APPROVED

Version 4: 2018-08-27 08:40:03 UTC by michielbdejong (6) Staff

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: No changes recorded

Updated Status: No changes recorded

Version 5: 2018-08-26 23:29:39 UTC by Michael (568) Curator

Previous Title:

Updated Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is less friendly to user privacy protection.

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis: The court of law for Discogs is located in the State of Oregon, USA. The United States have implemented some laws that are detrimental to the privacy of users of US-American services, most noticeably the PATRIOT Act.

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING