ToS;DR

The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection (California, U.S.A.)


Verified contributor veto period: this point will be auto-approved in 7 days on July 21, 2026 18:36.


Service: Snap Inc. (Snapchat)
Status: PENDING
Case: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection
Changes: 3
Source: link
Author: Dr_Jeff Lv. 94 Staff


Except to the extent they are preempted by U.S. federal law, the laws of California, other than its conflict-of-laws principles, govern these Terms and any claims and disputes (whether contract, tort, or otherwise) arising out of or relating to these Terms or their subject matter.


Comments:
On 2026-07-14 19:02:39 UTC, Dr_Jeff Lv. 94 Staff wrote:

point updated without comment

On 2026-07-14 19:02:48 UTC, Dr_Jeff Lv. 94 Staff wrote:

point updated without comment



We track editorial changes to analyses and updates to a point's status and display the previous versions here as part of an effort to promote transparency regarding our curation process.

Version 3: 2026-07-14 19:02:48 UTC by Dr_Jeff 20149 Lv. 94 Staff
Analysis updated

Previous Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection (Cal

Updated Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection (California, U.S.A.)

Version 2: 2026-07-14 19:02:39 UTC by Dr_Jeff 20149 Lv. 94 Staff
Analysis updated

Previous Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection

Updated Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection (Cal

Version 1: 2026-07-14 18:36:17 UTC by Dr_Jeff 20149 Lv. 94 Staff
Analysis created

Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection

Analysis: Generated through the annotate view

Status: PENDING