These Terms are to be governed by and interpreted under California law, without regard to its conflict of law principles.
APPROVED
No comment given
changes-requested: Please change title to "The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection (California, U.S.A)
Wouldn't that be answered by case 163?
changes-requested: Even if it is answered by the aforementioned point, the point here is to mention, if possible, which jurisdictions are friendlier. We should be explicit for our users.
Corrected Title
APPROVED
No comment given
Previous Status: PENDING
Updated Status: APPROVED
Previous Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection
Updated Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection (California, U.S.A)
Previous Status: CHANGES REQUESTED
Updated Status: PENDING
Previous Status: APPROVED
Updated Status: CHANGES REQUESTED
Previous Status: PENDING
Updated Status: APPROVED
Title: The court of law governing the terms is in a jurisdiction that is friendlier to user privacy protection
Analysis: Generated through the annotate view
Status: PENDING