An interesting case about enforceability


Service: (NONE)
Status: DECLINED
Case: none
Changes: 3
Source: link
Author: import script Bot


An interesting case about enforceability


Comments:
On 2018-05-18 13:49:33 UTC, Deleted wrote:

imported from 2482

On 2018-05-23 12:41:04 UTC, Deleted wrote:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tosdr/myps7Z7T-80/TbIW7EjxN9UJ An interesting case in Nevada where some arbitration clause was
not found enforceable.

http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/10/how_zappos_user.htm

In this case, the Terms of Service were just linked from the
bottom right hand corner of the website. Users did *not* click
through the usual "I agree to the terms of service" so the court
found there was no contractual relationship hence the arbitration
clause could not apply.

Best,
--
Hugo Roy, Project Lead
Terms of Service; Didn't Read | www.tosdr.org

On 2018-05-30 12:50:13 UTC, Deleted wrote:

imported status as declined



We track editorial changes to analyses and updates to a point's status and display the previous versions here as part of an effort to promote transparency regarding our curation process.

Version 1: 2018-05-30 12:50:13 UTC by Deleted

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: PENDING

Updated Status: DECLINED

Version 2: 2018-05-18 13:49:33 UTC by Deleted

Previous Title:

Updated Title: An interesting case about enforceability

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis: An interesting case about enforceability

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING

Version 3: 2018-05-17 08:37:53 UTC by Deleted

Previous Title:

Updated Title: [bad] You must cancel services before the end of trail periods to avoid being charged

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis: [bad] You must cancel services before the end of trail periods to avoid being charged

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING