review policy: jurisdictions and availability in specific countries


Service: (NONE)
Status: DECLINED
Case: none
Changes: 3
Source: link
Author: import script (4) Bot


review policy: jurisdictions and availability in specific countries


Comments:
On 2018-05-18 13:49:37 UTC, Deleted wrote:

imported from 2429

On 2018-05-23 12:40:54 UTC, Deleted wrote:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tosdr/CJEbW983NZM/KBwgES2TouEJ
related to the second point of the 'liability and indemnification' review policy, since we're on the topic of review policies, i would like to add a review policies for jurisdictions:

- it is OK for a service to choose jurisdiction in their place of business, even if this means that the service will not be available to certain users.

- it is also OK if a service is only available in certain countries because of licensing restrictions (example: spotify), or where the service is clearly marketed geographically. having said that, we want services to be available to users as universally and equally as possible.

- it is a plus point if a service has multiple jurisdictions to make it more accessible to more people. example: facebook is available in Cuba thanks to their second jurisdiction option in Ireland.

- also, it is a pluspoint if a service actively tries to be globally available, even if this implies complying with government censorship where strictly necessary, for instance Google (regrettably failed) attempts to be available in China.

--
tosdr.org | twitter.com/tosdr | github.com/tosdr
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Terms of Service; Didn't Read" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tosdr+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tosdr@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tosdr?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

On 2018-05-30 12:50:13 UTC, Deleted wrote:

imported status as declined



We track editorial changes to analyses and updates to a point's status and display the previous versions here as part of an effort to promote transparency regarding our curation process.

Version 1: 2018-05-30 12:50:13 UTC by Deleted Bot

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: PENDING

Updated Status: DECLINED

Version 2: 2018-05-18 13:49:37 UTC by Deleted Bot

Previous Title:

Updated Title: review policy: jurisdictions and availability in specific countries

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis: review policy: jurisdictions and availability in specific countries

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING

Version 3: 2018-05-17 08:37:52 UTC by Deleted Bot

Previous Title:

Updated Title: Youtube is not very reliable about the changing terms

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis: Youtube is not very reliable about the changing terms

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING