freedom of speech


Service: deleted 366
Status: DECLINED
Case: none
Changes: 2
Source: link
Author: michielbdejong Staff


freedom of speech


Comments:
On 2018-05-15 09:11:43 UTC, Deleted wrote:

imported from jMH1d6s8w80

On 2018-05-23 12:41:31 UTC, Deleted wrote:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tosdr/jMH1d6s8w80/Ug17pB63YXYJ I was just talking to Kirsten from HIIG about how there are some
interesting questions re ToS and freedom of speech. for instance,

Twitter
=====
- prohibits publishing content that:
- impersonates others or is intended to mislead
- is other people's confidential or private information
- contains a threat of violence
- is copyrighted
- is aimed at furthering illegal activities
- is spam

- they don't seem to talk about racism and other hatefully provocative
content, nor about nudity or culturally offensive content.

https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311-the-twitter-rules#

Facebook
=======
- prohibits publishing:
- violence and threats
- self harm
- bullying and harrassment
- hate speech
- graphic content
- nudity and pornography
- identity and privacy (way down the list, compared to where twitter puts it)
- intellectual property
- phishing and spam

- compared to twitter, no explicit mention of content that is aimed at
furthering illegal activities

http://www.facebook.com/communitystandards

Google+
=======
- the mention:
- illicit content
- malicious products
- hate speech
- personal and confidential information
- account hijacking
- child safety
- spam
- ranking manipulation
- sexually explicit material
- violent or bullying behaviour
- impersonation or deceptive behaviour
- they don't allow you to use a pseudonym
- don't sell regulated goods (viagra etc.)

http://www.google.com/intl/en/+/policy/content.html

So putting these three into a table, we see:

(T,F,G) violence and threats
(F) self harm
(F,G) bullying and harrassment
(F,G) hate speech
(F) graphic content
(F,G) nudity and pornography
(T,F,G) impersonation/misleading
(T,F,G) privacy of others
(T,F) intellectual property
(T,F,G) phishing and spam
(T) is aimed at furthering illegal activities
(G) illicit content
(G) malicious products
(G) child safety
(G) ranking manipulation
(G) they don't allow you to use a pseudonym
(G) don't sell regulated goods (viagra etc.)

This is just a quick first look at how different services restrict
your freedom of speech. most of them seem to be aimed at reasonable
reason, protecting the rights of others that often weigh against your
freedom of speech. But let's continue this discussion! :)

Ciao,
Michiel

On 2018-08-30 08:43:03 UTC, import script Bot wrote:

scripted message: please link to a quote

On 2018-09-10 10:14:04 UTC, import script Bot wrote:

scripted message: moving this point to Michiel

On 2021-01-29 01:55:31 UTC, JustinBack Staff wrote:

DECLINED



We track editorial changes to analyses and updates to a point's status and display the previous versions here as part of an effort to promote transparency regarding our curation process.

Version 1: 2021-01-29 01:55:31 UTC by JustinBack Staff

Previous Title: No changes recorded

Updated Title: No changes recorded

Previous Analysis: No changes recorded

Updated Analysis: No changes recorded

Previous Status: CHANGES REQUESTED

Updated Status: DECLINED

Version 2: 2018-05-15 09:11:43 UTC by Deleted

Previous Title:

Updated Title: freedom of speech

Previous Analysis:

Updated Analysis: freedom of speech

Previous Status:

Updated Status: PENDING