ToS;DR

Staff at this organisation receive training about handling data

When an organisation trains its staff regarding data, this should be regarded as a positive as it shows they are careful and helps staff to understand how to handle data.

Classification: good

Weight: 30



Service Title Rating Status Author
Xiaomi "We conduct security and privacy protection training courses and tests to enhance our employees' awareness of the importance of protecting personal information." APPROVED DJJ05
Patients Know Best "providing ongoing training to all employees and requiring the same of any company we contract to support us" APPROVED PKBIG
Hostinger "All information is stored securely and is accessed by qualified and authorized personnel only.</p>" PENDING Dr_Jeff Staff
Wealthsimple "We train our employees to keep clients’ personal information strictly private and confidential. We require all of our staff to sign confidentiality agreements that oblige them to respect and protect clients’ personal information." PENDING Dr_Jeff Staff
GNOME "The Foundation trains its administrators on our privacy policy guidelines and makes our privacy policy available to our partners." PENDING Dr_Jeff Staff
Vivaldi "<p>Vivaldi has strict restrictions on access to user data. Only a limited number of Vivaldi’s employees have access." PENDING Dr_Jeff Staff
Valnet "All of our employees, agents and partners are committed to keeping your data confidential.</p>" PENDING Dr_Jeff Staff
StartMail "On the Organizational Side</strong> we have strict protocols in place to ensure the safety of your data. For example:</p> <ul> <li><p>At each level, access to our systems is restricted to authorized staff with a legitimate need to know. This access is tightly limited and is only for the purpose of providing the StartMail Service to you.</p></li> <li><p>Any individual, who is given access to the StartMail system, is required to sign a confidentiality agreement.</p></li>" PENDING Dr_Jeff Staff


Comments:
On 2024-05-19 18:17:04 UTC, AgnesDeLion (20760) Staff wrote:

Corrected "recieve" to "receive"